To-date, OPA has 118 separate complaint investigations underway related to SPD officers’ potential misconduct at protests over the summer. As per city ordinance and the SPOG contract, OPA has 180 days to investigate a case and recommend discipline for any sustained complaints. The five cases today were released at day 120.
The Justice Department today announced the closure of its case concerning the provision of language assistance to individuals with limited English proficiency (LEP) in the state court system following the successful implementation of reforms by the Rhode Island Judiciary.
The Rhode Island Judiciary and the Justice Department successfully resolved an investigation of an administrative complaint filed under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin in federally funded programs or activities. The complaint alleged that the Rhode Island Judiciary failed to provide interpreters and other language assistance services to LEP court users. In 2012, following extensive negotiations between the Rhode Island Judiciary and the department, Chief Justice Paul A. Suttell of the Rhode Island Supreme Court issued Executive Order No. 2012-05 on language services in the courts to mandate that qualified interpreters and other approved language assistance be provided at no charge for individuals with LEP in all court proceedings, services and programs.
In 2014, the department approved the Rhode Island Judiciary’s language access plan and the parties signed a voluntary resolution agreement that required the successful implementation of the executive order and plan, continued input from a stakeholder committee, compliance with Title VI and two years of monitoring and technical assistance. Today, after the Rhode Island Judiciary completed the conditions for termination of the agreement, the department officially closed the case.
The department and the Rhode Island Judiciary have worked cooperatively to improve how the courts communicate with LEP court users. In addition to adopting the comprehensive language access policy contained in the executive order, the judiciary’s accomplishments include:
• Designating staff qualified to provide services to court customers in languages other than English;
• Posting signage in six languages throughout each court house advising the public of the right to an interpreter at no cost;
• Requiring both parties to state court actions to report interpreter needs data to the court through new e-filing requirements;
• Translating forms and website content into commonly spoken languages in Rhode Island, such as Spanish, Portuguese, Khmer and Cape Verdean;
• Creating a multilingual notice of right to language assistance and adopting a court rule requiring service of the notice upon each defendant in a proceeding;
• And, creating a language services complaint policy and posting a complaint form in multiple languages on the court’s website, in court clerk’s offices and in the Office of Court Interpreters.
“Access to justice requires that all people, including those with limited English proficiency, can fully access and fairly participate in our courts,” said Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Vanita Gupta, head of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division. “We commend Chief Justice Suttell and staff in the Administrative Office of State Courts for their efforts to make the promise of equal access to justice a reality for all Rhode Island residents.”
The Rhode Island matter was handled by Attorney Paul M. Uyehara of the Civil Rights Division’s Federal Coordination and Compliance (FCS) Section.
The complaint was resolved as part of the initiative by FCS to ensure that state courts comply with the language access requirements of Title VI. To ensure that no LEP individual is denied justice due to a court’s failure to provide language services, the FCS courts team provides policy guidance and technical assistance to state court systems and undertakes enforcement actions across the country.
For further information about FCS and Title VI, please visit https://www.justice.gov/crt/fcs. For additional LEP-related resources, please visit http://www.lep.gov/index.htm.
SEATTLE (AP) — Seattle’s police watchdog agency says city police officers didn’t violate any policies when they wore badges with black bands and kept their body-worn cameras turned off during protests this spring and summer.
The Seattle Times reports the Office of Police Accountability made the determiniation in new reports released Wednesday.
Particularly during the earliest Seattle protests this year in the wake of George Floyd’s death at the hands of police in Minneapolis, protesters and others had accused officers of trying to conceal police misconduct by not recording their actions and by using black tape on their badges, which protesters said obscured officers’ serial numbers.
However, OPA determined complaints about officers’ badges were unfounded and officers’ recordings were “lawful and proper” per the Seattle Police Department’s (SPD) policy on body-worn cameras in place at the time.
Closed case summaries on the complaints and a dozen others were posted to the OPA’s website Wednesday. As of October, OPA had received 19,000 complaints about officer behavior and SPD’s response to protests and opened 128 investigations.
Though the complaints about badges and bodycams were not sustained by OPA, both cases led to policy changes in the department, with Seattle Mayor Jenny Durkan issuing an executive order in June that SPD create a new policy requiring officers to record protests when officers anticipate they will have contact with the public, according to OPA’s case summaries.
On the badge issue, OPA determined the black tape officers wore over their badges was not meant to conceal officers’ identities but was worn to memorialize recently deceased officers from local law enforcement agencies.
As for bodvy cameras, OPA researched the City Council’s historical records and determined the city has a longstanding prohibition against photographing peaceful protests for law enforcement purposes that stemmed from news reports in the 1960s and 1970s that Seattle police had maintained files on community leaders and civil rights advocates.